Gifted Education Awareness Week – Namibia

Thanks to Roya Klingner of the Global Centre for Gifted Education for the invitation to write a post as part of Gifted Education Awareness Week in Namibia.

In December 2010 I proposed on #gtchat on Twitter that there should be an Global Gifted Education Awareness Day. From participating in #gtchat, it was clear that the biggest obstacle to promoting the needs of gifted children was awareness that they even existed in the first instance. It is simply not possible to address the issue of the needs of gifted children without first recognising what is a gifted child.

I was disappointed with the response. Although it was initially positive, it was clear that there lacked either the will to get behind the idea and contribute to it or that advocates – real and imaginary – had better things to do.  Clearly new initiatives require us to move out of our comfort zone. This can be hard for people.

The declaration of a Gifted Day by the World Council last year, as a tag on to the end of their World Conference, was a nice recognition of my request to them..even if it doesn’t get a mention on their news page. But it wasn’t what I was getting at. Firstly, it’s name varied – gifted day, international gifted day, day of gifted etc., meant that no one, including the World Council, knew what to do with it.  Secondly it did nothing and it achieved nothing.  Preaching to the converted never achieves anything.

If gifted advocacy is to achieve anything, it must look outwards beyond the narrow confines of those who ‘get’ (and those who earn from) giftedness. Advocacy must be pro-active. It must go to teachers, schools and policy makers and convince them of the merits of our cause; a cause that holds that gifted children have unique educational, social and emotional needs that must be specifically addressed in education if these children are ever to self-actualise.

It is on this basis that I co-founded Gifted Education Awareness Week in Ireland with my colleagues, Dr. Catherine Riordan and Karen McCarthy. For this event, we produced a leaflet and poster which was sent to school principals (2011) and SEN Coordinators (2012).We recongised that most teachers have the skills to address the educational needs of the majority of gifted children. However, we also recognised that teachers recieved little training that would inform their awareness of the presence of gifted children in the classroom.  By directly emailing schools we were able to speak directly to the 76,000 teachers in Ireland. I am pleased to support Talent Development for Children in Namibia 2012.  I am even more pleased that as part of the week, they aim to send a flyer and information leaflet to schools. It is direct advocacy like this that has the power to transform the reality of school life for gifted children. I would like to also highlight in this regard Roya Klingner’s work in promoting awareness among advocates.

I do not believe that gifted children are the ‘saviours of the universe’. I think the majority of children can acquire skills and other qualities that can enable them to contribute to our futures. However, it is clear that no country should allow the talent of any of their children to be wasted. By addressing the needs of its gifted children, Namibia can develop its pool of collective national genius to aid its development. Gifted Education Awareness Week in Namibia 2012 can be a powerful step in this direction.

 

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Gifted Education Awareness Week 2012

Gifted Education Awareness Week 2012 Leaflet

This leaflet was sent to 76,000 teachers

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Gifted Education Awareness Week 2012

2012 Leaflet here Gifted Education Awareness Week 2012 Leaflet

2011 was a very successful year in terms of raising awareness about issues affecting the inclusion of gifted children in schools in Ireland.  Thanks to Brian Clavin of KPMG we were able to fund the distribution of a poster and information leaflet to every school in the country as part of Ireland’s first National Gifted Education Awareness Day. The combination of this event with the first EU Talent Day represented a new departure in bringing the needs of gifted children to the attention of teachers.

Several articles were published in the Irish Independent, the Sunday Business Post and importantly in the ASTIR, the ASTI  publication that reaches 17,000 teachers (page 28). An advertisement for the Awareness day in INTOUCH, the magazine of INTO reached every primary school teacher on the island – north and south.

Our chat on gifted issues in Ireland (and elsewhere) on Twitter on Sunday evenings at 9pm has drawn a steady interest. #gtie is now a recognisable hash-tag among many significant advocates.  Teach Ireland and Gifted and Talented Network Ireland are growing and 2012 should see further, positive developments on those fronts. The Network also has a presence on Facebook for people who want to connect, join discussions and share resources.

Last year also saw, for the first time, a reference to gifted students in a Programme for Government. Coupled with support from the Minister and the Department this really was the icing on the cake.

” I very much welcome the initiative to establish the first EU Talent Day on 9 April, together with the National Gifted Education Awareness Day in Ireland on 8 April. We must nurture and support talent and giftedness, if we are to meet the challenges which face today’s society. This is a great opportunity to recognise and celebrate talent in many disciplines, and to promote an inclusive education system which meets all our students’ needs.”

Ruairí Quinn, Minister for Education and Skills (courtesy of the Sunday Independent).

This year we decided to be a little more ambitious and promote Gifted Education Awareness Week.  We have invited and will invite several fellow bloggers to contribute with a post on their site. We have a new leaflet in the pipeline to distribute to schools. And hopefully the media presence will come through. The main site for the week is gtnetwork.ie. Gifted and Talented Network Ireland is a network of advocates and Gifted Advocacy Support (GAS) groups in Ireland.

Awareness is not something that will suddenly take hold over night. However, I know that teachers are very interested in the idea of gifted children and how to meet their needs. And every step we take is one step closer to greater inclusion in schools.

Gifted Education Awareness Week (GEAW2012) begins on Monday February 27th and culminates in the annual CTYI Conference in DCU on Saturday 3rd March.  The theme of the conference is ‘Gifted Children inside the classroom and out’. This is the theme we have adopted for the Awareness Week. It is fitting that the first event of the week will be a special #edchatie Twitter Chat at 8.30pm on Monday evening. Big thanks to Fred Boss of the NCTE who hosts #edchatie every Monday. #edchatie attracts a large number of teachers from all around Ireland and it is great to have the opportunity to chat directly with them.  The title of the chat is ‘Gifted children inside the classroom and out’.

The logo (below) is the official Gifted Education Awareness Week logo. We think it’s pretty and speaks for itself.

Gifted Education Awareness Week Logo

GEAW 2012 Logo

Share
Posted in GEAW 2012 | Leave a comment

An Appeal to Schools and Teachers; So you think you’re inclusive?

Let’s just start with this. Most teachers have an IQ in excess of 130.  It is reasonable to assume, given genetic pre-disposition and given the nurturing environment of teachers’ homes, that often children of teachers are Exceptionally Able.
In my experience of CTYI, in each of my classes, the single largest represented profession was Teaching. The common denominator among all professions was the presence of books in the home from child birth.

Now the hard part.

Harmful Myth No. 2: Education provision for gifted children is elitist.

There are a few angles to statements like this, the answer to which requires a little more than a slap about the face with a wet fish and a conical hat that says ‘God, how dumb am I?’.

Angle No1. Gifted kids come from middle class backgrounds and allowing them access to gifted education provision gives them an advantage that working class children miss out on.

Well, come on.  What about the 5% of working class children who are gifted? They wouldn’t miss out if there was a government policy that required schools to evidence planning for Exceptionally Able children.

Every child who is Exceptionally Able should have access to gifted education provision. At the moment, if there is elitism it is because middle class families are prepared to and can more afford private enrichment programmes like CTY that compensate for the TOTAL absence of government-mandated provision. (note: CTY does have scholarships).

The best way to eliminate any perceived elitism is to ensure that all schools, whether they are in middle class or working class areas have, at the very least, a basic recognition that 5% of ALL children, regardless of background, are Exceptionally Able and that they address the implications of this.

SIMPLY – to provide opportunities for ALL Exceptionally Able children is to practice inclusivity.

Angle No.2 We can’t provide resources for or support gifted children because it’s only for gifted children and is therefore not inclusive (one of top 10 ‘control statements’ of all time and quoted more than once to me).

The answer to this exists on two levels. Firstly, not every child is gifted. It would be pointless to provide access to a gifted programme for child of average ability. The whole purpose is to provide a programme for gifted children (see Why below). Everything else is called ‘ regular school’. If regular school met the needs of gifted children, you wouldn’t be reading this.

DO note however, that it is possible to make provision within a single class that is suitable to all ability levels.  And for no monetary cost.

Secondly, we already have educational exclusion in Irish schools. How? Well, most Junior Cycle schools operate mixed ability classrooms. The NCCA promotes mixed ability classroom organisation – it is intended to be ‘inclusive’ and prevent the worst excesses of ‘streaming’ (or ‘setting’). This is fine. Except we already have streaming-by-proxy. This is where students with learning problems are pulled out of class for extra ‘help’.

In a regular mixed ability classroom, given all the dynamics, it is a well established fact that teachers teach to the middle ability (in fact, teachers teach to the top of the lowest ability but that’s another issue). So in these classrooms, average ability students are provided for; and we have extra help for weaker students. BUT we have nothing for gifted children.

Most teachers aren’t even aware there are Exceptionally Able children in their classrooms.

SIMPLY – in the Irish education system, gifted children – 5% of any school, are EXCLUDED on the first day they step inside the school halls .!

Why should we have recognition or a programme for gifted children?

Well, a programme would be nice, but I know resources are scarce so I’ll settle, for the time being, for an interested, motivated and aware teacher.

We need to provide for gifted children because every child – EVERY CHILD, not just the average ability child, or the SEN child, EVERY child has a RIGHT to an EDUCATION that is APPROPRIATE to their NEEDS. Gifted children, as a whole, do not receive ability-appropriate learning opportunities in Irish schools.

Every child has a right to an education that helps them strive towards achieving their potential.  Wouldn’t you want that for your child?

Gifted children have a civil and human right to an education that matches there needs.

BUT if you don’t believe me, and you think the civil/human rights thing is glib, then don’t.

Rigid dumbed-down curriculum offers no challenge or engagement

http://blog.collectables-now.com/

Carry on your merry deluded way……..and enjoy living with the behavioural problems it creates in your school and classroom…..and ultimately in society. And when you go home and ask your child how their school day was, don’t bother wondering if they were actually engaged in class or whether their teacher had them sitting in a time-out chair for most of the day.

And if you can’t be bothered, because it’s ‘SO much work’, or whatever other excuse, then really, should you be teaching at all?

And if you are ‘management’ and can’t be bothered because you haven’t the will, should you even have anything to do with children.

Sorry if all this is in your face, but I have children. I want them to get the education that will help them be the best they can be in life.  I think you want that for your children too. Don’t you?

Share
Posted in Education Reform, Gifted Awareness, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

I hate School

It may seem somewhat odd to hear a teacher say they hate school. It just doesn’t sound right. After all, if one hated school, why become a teacher.

I became a teacher because that is what I wanted to do. I’m not sure where it came from other than I was born with this. If I wasn’t a teacher, I could do other jobs; but teaching is where I come alive. And if I wanted to teach young adults, it had to be in a school since school is prima facie the most economical way to deliver society-wide education and that is where teaching jobs are. That said, there is a big difference between a school and an individual classroom.  School can be something that happens outside the classroom.

Now my school is pretty fantastic, as are many others. So I am not writing about a particular school, but rather school as a concept. I think of a 4 or 5 year old child who has spent most of all of his/her short life with Mum (sometimes Dad). They usually have had exclusive access to a nurturing experience within which s/he has grown and developed and learned buckets of things – including how to talk, construct sentences, sing, create stories and paint the most fantastic works of art (they may not think it so when they are 21 but we know how fantastic that first finger painting is!).

And when the time arrives, we drag them away to an over-crowded alien environment often enclosed with high metal fencing (sometimes topped with barbed wire!) with hordes of often screaming, noisy, boisterous, lice ridden (occasionally), chicken-pox-y, fluey other people. Sounds a lot like prison, doesn’t it.

It is hardly a more attractive alternative to the learning environment of the last 4 or 5 years.  This is not to deny that there are many children for whom school is a relief from what home has to offer. But as a concept – I don’t think school as a ‘place of learning’ can compete with the experience of the home as an educational environment. A generalisation to be sure, but I think you get the point.

I am not an advocate for homeschooling. Or at least, not exclusive homeschooling.  I think school has a lot to offer both in and beyond the formal curriculum just as homeschooling has a lot to offer in terms of the formal curriculum.

What I think teachers, school leaders and government should bear in mind (i.e. keep it in their mind on an ongoing thing) is that school is not perfect. Nor can it be.  But that shouldn’t stop us from trying to explore ways in which to make school more reflective of the learning environment in which children first learn. I don’t mean it should be all cuddles and hugs. But concepts such as that in Finland of ‘school mother‘ are indicative of an effort to make school more homely.

In Ireland, we are about to embark on what I believe is a misguided ‘reform’ of our education system.  There are many arguments for my position but one notable one is that nothing is being said about the impact of the school environment on learning success. Sadly, in this regard, there is much that remains to be learned.

So while I am not an out-and-out advocate for homeschooling, I do think we need something more like Home/Schools. If schools were a more natural extension of home and how learning occurs there, I think we could go some way to resolving many of the ills of school.

 

Share
Posted in Education Reform, Teaching, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Logotude

I said I would write a post about the logo for this site when I got a chance.  It a bit naff and completely obvious but it gives me an opportunity to say a few things.

The logo is simply made up for the capital letters for Gifted & Talented Ireland in purple against a green background.

G is for Gifted.  I know the word carries a load.  The debate about whether we should continue to use it and what could better take its place rages on.

Personally, I think we need to get over it. There are labels everywhere but they only have the significance we give them. If I say a child is gifted, I am not saying they are better than another child, whatever better is supposed to be or mean. I am simply saying this child exhibits an intellectual capacity that creates a academic, artistic, musical, sporting, social or emotional need that must be addressed if this child is to reach their potential as a human being.

We can debate endlessly the merits and demerits of the word ‘gifted’.  But this is not and can not be the core function of gifted advocates.  Our core function must be to spread awareness of the presence of gifted children, specifically in schools, and to design or assist the design of appropriate provision to meet their needs. Built into this, of course, is the need to identify gifted children and identify best practice to resolve their needs.

T is for Talented. In Ireland, the council in charge of  curriculum design for the school system, in their guidelines for teachers of gifted children, substituted the word ‘Gifted’ with ‘Exceptionally Able’.  ‘Talented’ got lost in the mix. In the UK, talented is used to refer to children with an artistic, drama or sporting talent. Either way, ‘gifted and talented’ is by far the most readily recognised descriptor of our field – hence G&T.

I is for Ireland. There is hardly any provision for gifted and talented children in Ireland.  There is a pilot scheme run by the SESS but this is not a substitute for systematic provision across the school system. ICEPE provides online training for teachers. CTYI provides enrichment activities and is the only specialist centre in Ireland in which research is taking place.  Margaret Keane has done invaluable work raising the profile of gifted children.  This needs to reach a larger audience.  Dr. Catherine Riordan and Karen McCarthy - have been alone in proactively contributing a voice to education policy formulation from gifted perspective. And I have been doing a bit here and there. And everywhere, with Catherine and Karen. Plus there’s #gtie on Twitter (returning soon!). Anna Giblin moderates the public voice of the giftedkids forum. Leslie Graves, a self-styled ‘occasional lecturer, UCD’, gives a presentation as a parent of gifted children to the M.Psych class every year. Unfortunately the IAGC broke up in a regrettable manner; but Gifted and Talented Network Ireland was launched as the new national association for Ireland in April and this is growing excellently. 2011 has been an excellent year for awareness here with the first ever National Gifted Education Awareness Day and several sympathetic articles in national newspapers.  The new school year will see further growth in this awareness.

The ‘T’ and the ‘i’ overlap to represent a figure, which to my mind is the gifted child.  That worked out nicely! You’ll notice that the left arm of the child/T has a angled edge whereas the right arm is straight.  This represents the fact that a significant percentage of gifted children are 2e – Twice Exceptional – meaning they are gifted but also have a learning difficulty – dyslexia, dyspraxia or ADHD etc.

The purple worked well against the background in green (figure that one yourself).  There is no other particular reason for purple despite it’s many associations.  I just thought it looked better and was less clichéd than orange.

You’ll notice the ‘G’ is a very round G – as if to convey a round peg in a square hole. Gifted children don’t fit very well into the square holes the school system creates for children – though we know gifted children would dearly like to ‘fit in’ in school. Some gifted children react and try to break out. This is represented by the left arm jutting out from the square background. This arm also represents the fact that gifted children have abilities that extend beyond the average – the square into which most children fit.

Back to the T.  I was originally creating the angled edge for the arm on the right. But I wanted it to be forward looking.  I put the angle on the left arm which makes it look like the gifted child is pointing forward. Gifted children want to move forward in their education. Gifted advocates must have this to the forefront of their minds.  Is what you are doing moving forward the issue of improving the educational experience of gifted children?  If not, what are you doing?

While we must debate, research, collaborate and even engage in business consultancy – in our work we must at all times be looking to see how we can apply what we learn from degree programs, research, day-to-day teaching and so on to helping gifted children be recognised and provided for in their education. That is what Gifted and Talented Ireland is all about.

 

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Must-haves for Teachers

This is time of year when everyone starts preparing for school, usually somewhat nervously in anticipation of what the year will bring.  This is most true for those starting school – primary, secondary or third level. It applies to teachers as much as students, but particularly so to trainee teachers.

Some weeks ago there was a discussion on @gtchat about what makes a great teacher for gifted children. I offered some suggestions and thought it was timely to elaborate.

There is a danger with discussion topics like this in that they can end up producing a list of qualities that no known person in the world has, or at least, not at the same time.  Teachers are human and  so we have our faults and quirks just like everyone else. We can inspirational’ but not all the time.  We can be ‘motivational’, but not all the time.  We can ‘differentiate’, though it isn’t always the best way to achieve particular learning outcomes. We can be ‘humourous’ although this is more difficult first thing on Monday morning and just after a pay cut. These are indeed qualities teachers should have but then they are qualities that most people possess. Yet is is clear that not all people capable of being great teachers.

I can not categorically say what makes a great teacher. Nor that if a teacher has certain qualities they will alway be a great teacher. Part of the problem here is that what makes a teacher great is, I believe, at least 50% subjective opinion. Unless we are to be all things to all people, it is simply impossible to objectively say a teacher is great.  It is worth noting that this is not the same as identifying a poor teacher. A poor teacher is poor for everyone; a great teacher is not great for eveyone ie. At some point the subjectivity creeps in.

globalcatalystgroup.com

Humour, respect, understanding are all the grease that helps turn the wheels of teaching.  But there are  basic attitudes and approaches to the task of teaching which I think are fundamental to the ‘job’.  The extent of these are present in the individual – not too much, not too little – are, I think, what makes a teacher great (please note I’m not ascribing these to myself!)

1. Passionate about helping young minds grow

Teachers need to be interested in young people first and foremost.  Children can be frustrating and sometimes do and say the most stupid of things.  They can be annoying and immature (who would have guessed!).  But adults (sometimes not much better!) need to recognise that children are these things because they are learning.  Children need the space to make mistakes and the forgiveness of the adults around them so that they can move beyond them. In this way they can grow. Teachers needs to be passionate about the process of helping children learn.  This means getting over the silly things they sometimes do and remembering what is the goal of education – the formation of young minds.

2. Passionate about learning and about their discipline

Teachers need to be interested in their subject and interested in learning.  It is not sufficient to go into a classroom and reguriate everything one covered on one’s degree course, suitably cropped for first or second level. Teachers need to be interested in the process of learning and in finding new ways help children develop their own learning.

In Ireland, second level teachers usually teach 2 subjects.  Often one of them will be the poor relation i.e. the teacher will have fewer timetabled hours in it.  Teachers need to be equally curious and interested in both subjects. This sounds like a given but I’ve met plenty of teachers who teach what has become for them a  ‘9 to 4 shift’. Thanksfully, I believe they are in the minority. It’s not enough to enjoy the subject.  I believe a teacher has to love the subject. Join your subject association/professional body.

3. Models learning behaviour

A teacher has to model the kinds of behaviour they wish to see in their students. We know students learn from making mistakes in their learning.  Imagine a teacher couldn’t admit the same – deliberate or not!

A former student of mine corrected me on a silly mistake I made one day in class.  Average air pressure is 1013.25 mb – basic stuff, I should have known it.  I did; but what I knew was incorrect (1004mb) (I do have an excuse!).  Thankfully she corrected me.  I don’t think she believed me at the time (and still doesn’t) but it was really important and I am glad she did.

Now what if everyone in the class knew this and I had steadfastly refuted it? What kind of message would that have sent out? There’s no point having the correct answers so don’t bother looking them up?

But that is basic stuff.  Teachers need to bring frsh material and ideas to the classroom. The days of students copying reams of 30 year old notes from overhead projectors or the

mothball the hops now!

www.speedofcreativity.org

blackboard are long gone.  Those who cling to them have a serious decision to make.  Sure it’s a job.  But what we teach a child lasts generations. Teachers have to care. If you don’t care, don’t teach.

4. Desire and ability to collaborate

Where would Lennon and McCartney have been without each other?  While they were brilliant in their own right, something about the fact that they collaborated allowed them to access a level of creativity that was unmatched in the popular music.

It’s more than ‘two brains are better than one’ – the whole is always greater than the sum of the parts.  By collaborating teachers can test their teaching experiences and idea’s against the experience of their colleagues, learn something new, or different and model the collaborative behaviour they would expect students to use in group work.  Sharing ideas for practice is a win-win for everyone involved. The alternative is 40 years inside a classroom where no ideas get out and no ideas gets in.

Collaboration has other benefits. Teachers dread the arrival of Inspectors.  I read somewhere that in the dim and distant past, Inspectors in Finland needed escorts due to threats they recieved visiting schools! They eventually got rid of the Inspectors in Finland altogether.  But there is a lot that can be learned by a teacher by having another professional give some feedback. I’m a fan of peer evaluation and think that this would be good as a model of inspection for teachers.  I’m not going to go into this here just now, but I believe collaboration at this level can benefit the teaching community enormously.

5. Demonstrable Commitment to Continuing Professional Development

The Teaching Council in Ireland has published its Policy on Continuing Professional Devcelopment. Most of it is undefined – full of ‘shoulds’, rather than a holding concrete recognition of what constitutes CPD.  I’ll blabber on another time about this amorphous creature. Suffice to say that CPD is a given for anyone calling themself a ‘professional’. In a regulated profession there should be a CPD policy.  But for years Ireland didn’t havefrom debtfinancingblog.com one. Still, teachers undertook, and still undertake, courses and activities that any sane human being would recognise as contributing to their work. The urge to keep up-to-date with skills and knowledge marks out one teacher from another.  In an ideal world, CPD would happen as a matter of course.  But it’s not and it doesn’t.

CPD doesn’t have to be always subject specific.  One can learn all sort of things in all sorts of places. And when one goes places, one finds all sorts of things to bring back. Already in the last year I have brought back Twitter, Google+, and much more. I tried them out and then found out how they could help my teaching. If you don’t go somewhere, you won’t get anywhere.

I could go on so just one last point.

We are used to talking about teachers as people who teach children.  We talk less about teachers as people who help children learn.  For all the talk of ‘child-centred education’, much of it is still focused on teacher delivery of material in the classroom, rather than on the delivery of learning opportunities for children.  We talk of teaching and learning – clearly two separates tasks  – yet our treatment of them is the same; we assume that if teaching is happening, so too must learning.  This is not the case.  I think that if we are to reform the education system in Ireland, we need to stop talking about teaching in the classroom, and talk more about learning in the classroom.  In this context, the teacher stops delivering information that can be found anywhere, and intead becomes a facilitator of learning. Instead of what we call ‘child centred education’ we should have ‘child centred learning’. One day.

 

 

 

Share
Posted in Education Reform, Gifted Awareness, Teaching | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Junior Cycle Reform

This post is a little off topic for the site but as I am President of the Association of Geography Teachers of Ireland and given the current threat to remove Geography as a single, systematic course of study from the Core Curriculum of the Junior Cycle, it deserves an airing here. That and the cloak-and-dagger nature of the process just irks me.

The Jesuits had a phrase ‘Give me a boy until he is seven and I will show to you the man’. The quote is attributed to Loyola and exists in several versions. But I always understood it to mean that those characteristics which are present in the man (& woman) have their foundations in the early periods of a child’s development. Montessori knew this also.

There has been much criticism of the Junior Cycle (students 12-15 years of age). It started life as a criticism of the Junior Cycle Examinations but the need to reform this seems to have morphed into a radical change to the nature of Junior Cycle education in Ireland. There is much that can be improved. But one should always be wary of change for change sake and all the other reasons for proposed changes other than the explicit and verifiable improvement in standards. Interestingly, the National Parent’s Council – Post Primary have said the ‘system is not broken, why fix it?’.

The changes coming include more emphasis on literacy and numeracy – call it ‘teach to the test’ – (which seems to be based on a false understanding of the PISA scores). There was no mention of graphicacy in the literacy and numeracy plans.

There will be a reduced core – Irish, English, Maths and Science and of course CSPE. Schools will decide on the rest of the curriculum – probably including taster courses. Instead of the Junior Cycle being built around subjects, it will be built around skills. Content will have only the importance conferred on it by the students’ need to learn a skill. But because students will only be allowed sit 8 exams, there is a good chance they will only acquire the skills provided by the examinable subjects. Skills provided by other subjects may not be learned because they won’t need to be. We know this from the Leaving Certificate where many students don’t need Higher Maths for their college course and so they drop it to focus on their other 6 exams subjects.

Skills are important. But the teaching of them in a system in which they are learned cannot be said to be education.  It is mere training. Instead of educating the mind of a child, it seems we are now to treat them like monkeys doing tricks. Learned that skill? Here, have a peanut.

There will be a change to the examination process – with continual assessment of some sort carried out by someone (no one is quite certain who yet). This will have interesting consequences for standards – but one will have to be prepared to be flexible in one’s understanding of the term ‘standards’.

Adopting the education ‘reforms’ tried and tested in other jurisdictions 10 to 20 years ago and which have failed will not necessarily work here simply because we are a different country. Of course, the corollary is that they could. We don’t know. But one thing we do know is that ‘taster’ courses do not a rounded education make.

Just because knowledge can be found anywhere (this is usually taken to mean the internet), doesn’t mean children will go looking for it (say nothing about the digital divide). Teaching learning skills is important, but what learning will students do with those skills? By adopting a taster approach to subjects, students will miss out on the rigor that for many years defined Irish education.

While I have a bias, few could fail to see the importance of geography as a core component of a child’s education. The most important things in the education of a child, have to be taught early and often. There is a good chance that Irish children will go through second level education without ever having studied any geography (history is also in the same boat). We know that this has had profound consequences for British society.

People do not live in a vacuum where the mere possession of skills is sufficient to live.  They live in spaces and are affected deeply by them – economically, socially or physically. Fundamental to an understanding of the world and our place in it, is an appreciation of the skills, attitudes, values and knowledge conferred by geography. These are the weaker reasons for maintain geography as a core, single, systematic course of study at Junior Cycle. Here are ten more.

The removal of geography as a core subject at Junior Cycle would be a mistake. Several countries discovered this and have reintroduced it. No country can develop a smart, globalized economy without geography in their school system. www.agti.ie

Share
Posted in Education Reform, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Thank You!

The idea for National Gifted Education Awareness Day (NGEAD) was born in December 2010. I was on #gtchat on Twitter (Fridays 5pm and midnight GMT) chatting about global gifted advocacy(@DeborahMersino). One common theme that seemed to run through the chat was that there was little awareness in schools of Gifted/Exceptionally Able children in the classroom.

It seemed to me the logical answer to this was a campaign to raise awareness. Teachers already have the skills to engage Gifted and Talented children. Simple awareness had the potential to deliver immediate gains. So I proposed a Global Gifted Education Awareness Day. The structures are not yet ready for this but perhaps one day they will be.

In the mean time, I thought it would be useful to have a model that could be used if such a day was to come to pass. Hence National Gifted Education Awareness Day (NGEAD) was born. There was a clear need for such a day. I knew teachers would be open to receiving information on the needs of Exceptionally Able children. However, at initial teacher education level there is little reference to this group of children. Often there is none.  The NCCA has issued Draft Guidelines on teaching Exceptionally Able children and the SESS has run a pilot scheme in 11 schools. But over all, there was much to be done to raise awareness of teachers of the presence of Exceptionally Able children in the classroom. I established this site and several other initiatives as a means of contributing to improved awareness.

As is often the case, three brains works better than one and so it was the synergy of efforts with Catherine Riordan and Karen McCarthy that made NGEAD happen. Together with enormous input from Natalie Butler and Elaine Moore Mackey we put together a plan to raise awareness in Irish schools. The first EU Talent Day was declared for April 9th so it was decided to combine the two days into one event to raise awareness and celebrate Irish talent. Our initial plan received a set back when we first costed it. Our response was to use electronic means to deliver the campaign. This would have been fine though we knew it would not be as effective as a print campaign.

end of poster

Supporters of NGEAD and EUTD

Then, the magic happened. We received the support Department of Education, two principals’ associations, the largest second level teachers’ union and 3 parents associations all came on board to support the endeavour. This is probably the first time so many education partners have all been on the same page in support of such a project. We are immensely grateful.

And then something even more magical happened. Brian Clavin in KPMG Ireland offered KPMG’s support to fund the distribution of our materials to every school in the country. This meant we could write directly to school Principals in over 4000 schools, tell them of the support we received from the education partners and ask if they would display an enclosed A3 poster and distribute an information leaflet to their staff. We are grateful to Brian and KPMG for their support. KPMG’s funding made an immeasurable difference to the success of the project.

We are thankful to schools for their positive response the to campaign. To put things into context. Schools and teachers are under pressure to deliver more and to do so amid a climate of pay and funding cuts. To ask teachers help with this initiative was difficult, but without them little could be achieved. The response we had has been simply magnificent. Whether it is schools principals who see how providing for high ability students can stretch all students, SEN teachers who know that more can be done for students who had been forgotten about or classroom teachers who simply want to know how they can make even more of a difference in their classrooms, there is a clear motivation among teachers in Ireland to effect change in the school experience of Exceptionally Able children.

It is difficult for education partners to support new initiatives that add a layer of complexity to the myriad of other issues facing education in Ireland. Yet their openness to support NGEAD shows that where it matters – the education of our children – there is a fantastic willingness to contribute to progress in education.

And amid a recession, when businesses everywhere are cutting back and making efficiencies, KPMG saw worthwhile project which they felt needed support that had been previously missing. Their generousity with regard to this initiative can not be overstated.

Awareness is not something that happens overnight. We know it is a developmental process. But we also know that awareness can grow exponentially. Now that NGEAD has come and gone, next years plans are already at an advanced stage of planning. Gifted and Talented matters in Ireland have entered a new and exciting phase – one which we intend will grow and develop. You can be a part of this either as an advocate and supporter through Gifted and Talented Network Ireland or as a teacher through TEACH Ireland.

Share
Posted in EUTD, KPMG, NGEAD | Leave a comment

National Gifted Education Awareness Day

Below is our poster for EU Talent Day And National Gifted Education Awareness Day.

This day has the official support of the Department of Education and Skills. The Minister for Education, Ruairi Quinn, has declared his own personal recognition of Gifted and Talented students:

I very much welcome the initiative to establish the first EU Talent Day on 9 April, together with the National Gifted Education Awareness Day in Ireland on 8 April. We must nurture and support talent and giftedness, if we are to meet the challenges which face today’s society. This is a great opportunity to recognise and celebrate talent in many disciplines, and to promote an inclusive education system which meets all our students’ needs.”

Official support has been given by the national associations of both Primary and Post Primary school Principals (NAPD, IPPN), the largest secondary school teachers’ union (ASTI), and three national parents’ representative bodies (NPCpp, PACCS, FEDCBS). This is probably the first time that all these groups have come together in support of an event such as this.

Advocates for gifted children in Ireland now have an opportunity like never before. We must seize it with both hands and find a way to work together to rise to the challenge. To that end, everyone with an interest in this area is invited to attend a meeting at Dublin ZOO at 2pm on Saturday 9th April where there will be two important events:

The launch of TEACH Ireland, an association for Teachers of Exceptionally Able Children in Ireland. All teachers are invited to register their interest by signing the register on the TEACH Ireland site.

The launch of Gifted and Talented Network Ireland. Please sign the register to let us know you are coming. This meeting will explore ideas as to how this network of diverse groups or organisations around the country with an interest in giftedness or gifted education might function. We really want to hear views and suggestions so we can put shape on the network. Don’t feel you are ‘joining up’ to something. The main concept is the creation of a network of interested parties with a view to progressing gifted education in Ireland. Come along and find out more next Saturday at 2.00pm in Dublin Zoo but please register first.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment